Re: [PATCH v2 02/36] cpu_x86: Promote added/removed from ancestor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:32:42PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> When a CPU model is defined based on another model, we were completely
> ignoring features marked as added to or removed from the original model
> after it was released. For added features this is the right thing to do
> as it will promote them to become normal features included in the new
> model. But features marked as removed would become included in the new
> model as well. We need to explicitly remove them as if they were never
> included in the model.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux