On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:14:28PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:09:00PM +0000, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 12:46:55PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > A key difference that is probably relevant is that netbsd is > > > using an e1000 NIC in QEMU, while openbsd is using a virtio-net > > > NIC. At least when created by virt-manager. > > > > > > AFAIR, QEMU's magic checksum offload only happens for virtio-net, > > > so presumably our rules are incompatible with non-virtio-net NICs > > > in someway. > > > > Yes, that's it! The GNU/Hurd and Haiku guests are also using e1000, > > since virtio drivers are not available there; moreover, if I switch a > > random Linux guest from virtio-net to e1000 I can reproduce the issue > > there as well. > > Incidentally, I think this has crossed the threshold where the cure is > worse than the disease. > > We cannot ship the forthcoming libvirt release with a checksum "fix" > that breaks all usage of NICs that aren't virtio-net, as that guarantees > brokeness for all historical OS. > > If we can't quickly find a way to improve this, I think we need to > revert (or disable) the checksum zero'ing fix for this release and > spend more time investigating it. Agreed. Going back to the drawing board in a sense, have we figured out why FreeBSD's DHCP client is unhappy with the previous arrangement? It seems to me that fixing it might be the most sensible course of action. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
