On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:47:17AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Gerhard Stenzel (gstenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 12:13 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > I'd suggest to use this patch as a base for triggering the setup
> > > protocol with the 802.1Qb{g|h} switch.
> >
> > Here is a RFC patch, which demonstrates how libvirt could communicate
> > with lldpad via the lldptool for the 802.1Qbg case. Please note, that
> > there is currently no public available version of lldptool which accepts
> > this command line. This is also work in progress.
>
> Can this be made a library instead of an exec() based cmdline interface?
Hum, actually from a libvirt deployment POV, depending on an unstable
library is way worse than depending on a command line interface. I.e.
the library would make sense only if we had some serious garantee of
stabilities, API/ABI garantees, etc ... In the absence of someone firmly
commiting to this, a CLI is less dangerous. So at least in a first
step an exec() based interface sounds the right approach to me.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list