2010/5/12 Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> virLibConnError already includes __FUNCTION__ in its output, so we
> were redundant. Furthermore, clang warns that __FUNCTION__ is not
> a string literal (at least __FUNCTION__ will never contain %, so
> it was not a security risk).
>
> * src/datatypes.c: Replace __FUNCTION__ with a descriptive string.
> ---
> src/datatypes.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/datatypes.c b/src/datatypes.c
> index 25962a6..cea8765 100644
> --- a/src/datatypes.c
> +++ b/src/datatypes.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ virUnrefConnect(virConnectPtr conn) {
> int refs;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn))) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
As Chris pointed out a while ago:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg01241.html
There are some error codes that have string representations attached
which imply a certain usage style. VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG is one of
those. See virErrorMsg:
case VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG:
if (info == NULL)
errmsg = _("invalid argument in");
else
errmsg = _("invalid argument in %s");
break;
This implies that you pass the function name as additional
information. But I must admit that I never used VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG as
it is implied, because I wasn't aware of that until recently.
The VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR is an even worse example:
case VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR:
if (info == NULL)
errmsg = _("XML description not well formed or invalid");
else
errmsg = _("XML description for %s is not well formed
or invalid");
break;
Unrelated to your patch I suggest that we unify the string
representations for error codes to a common style:
case VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG:
if (info == NULL)
errmsg = _("invalid argument");
else
errmsg = _("invalid argument: %s");
break;
case VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR:
if (info == NULL)
errmsg = _("XML description not well formed or invalid");
else
errmsg = _("XML description not well formed or invalid: %s");
break;
And adapt the callers.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ virGetDomain(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name, const unsigned char *uuid) {
> virDomainPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL) || (uuid == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ virUnrefDomain(virDomainPtr domain) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_DOMAIN(domain)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
VIR_IS_CONNECTED_DOMAIN is false if domain isn't a domain, or if it's
connection object isn't a connection. Therefore "no connection" is
incomplete.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&domain->conn->lock);
> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ virGetNetwork(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name, const unsigned char *uuid) {
> virNetworkPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL) || (uuid == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ virUnrefNetwork(virNetworkPtr network) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_NETWORK(network)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
As with VIR_IS_CONNECTED_DOMAIN above "no connection" is incomplete here.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&network->conn->lock);
> @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ virGetInterface(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name, const char *mac) {
> virInterfacePtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/2 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
>
> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ virUnrefInterface(virInterfacePtr iface) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_INTERFACE(iface)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
The same as with VIR_IS_CONNECTED_DOMAIN and VIR_IS_CONNECTED_NETWORK above.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&iface->conn->lock);
> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ virGetStoragePool(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name, const unsigned char *uui
> virStoragePoolPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL) || (uuid == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ virUnrefStoragePool(virStoragePoolPtr pool) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_STORAGE_POOL(pool)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is incomplete here too.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&pool->conn->lock);
> @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ virGetStorageVol(virConnectPtr conn, const char *pool, const char *name, const c
> virStorageVolPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL) || (key == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ virUnrefStorageVol(virStorageVolPtr vol) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_STORAGE_VOL(vol)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
And another incomplete message.
> return(-1);
> }
> virMutexLock(&vol->conn->lock);
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ virGetNodeDevice(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name)
> virNodeDevicePtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/2 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ virGetSecret(virConnectPtr conn, const unsigned char *uuid,
> char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn) || uuid == NULL || usageID == NULL) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return NULL;
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ virUnrefSecret(virSecretPtr secret) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_SECRET(secret)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
And another incomplete message.
> return -1;
> }
> virMutexLock(&secret->conn->lock);
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ virGetNWFilter(virConnectPtr conn, const char *name, const unsigned char *uuid)
> virNWFilterPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_CONNECT(conn)) || (name == NULL) || (uuid == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
"no connection" is only true in 1/3 of the possibilities to get into this block.
> return(NULL);
> }
> virMutexLock(&conn->lock);
> @@ -1526,7 +1526,7 @@ virUnrefNWFilter(virNWFilterPtr pool) {
> int refs;
>
> if (!VIR_IS_CONNECTED_NWFILTER(pool)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("no connection"));
And another incomplete message.
> return -1;
> }
> virMutexLock(&pool->conn->lock);
> @@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ virGetDomainSnapshot(virDomainPtr domain, const char *name)
> virDomainSnapshotPtr ret = NULL;
>
> if ((!VIR_IS_DOMAIN(domain)) || (name == NULL)) {
> - virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, __FUNCTION__);
> + virLibConnError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, _("not a snapshot"));
This block is entered if domain is no domain or name is NULL,
therefore "not a snapshot" is a misleading error message here.
Matthias
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list