Re: [PATCH 09/10] resctrl: Do not use max_id for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/24 16:47, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/conf/capabilities.c |  5 ++-
>  src/util/virresctrl.c   | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  src/util/virresctrl.h   |  3 ++
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/conf/capabilities.c b/src/conf/capabilities.c
> index 1d3b7050b2e3..3d0602e1b6fe 100644
> --- a/src/conf/capabilities.c
> +++ b/src/conf/capabilities.c
> @@ -2128,7 +2128,9 @@ virCapabilitiesInitResctrlMemory(virCaps *caps)
>          node = g_new0(virCapsHostMemBWNode, 1);
>  
>          if (virResctrlInfoGetMemoryBandwidth(caps->host.resctrl,
> -                                             bank->level, &node->control) > 0) {
> +                                             bank->level,
> +                                             bank->id,
> +                                             &node->control) > 0) {
>              node->id = bank->id;
>              node->cpus = virBitmapNewCopy(bank->cpus);
>  
> @@ -2269,6 +2271,7 @@ virCapabilitiesInitCaches(virCaps *caps)
>              if (i == caps->host.cache.nbanks) {
>                  /* If it is a new cache, then update its resctrl information. */
>                  if (virResctrlInfoGetCache(caps->host.resctrl,
> +                                           bank->id,
>                                             bank->level,
>                                             bank->size,
>                                             &bank->ncontrols,
> diff --git a/src/util/virresctrl.c b/src/util/virresctrl.c
> index f3ec4d67059f..3acc1447ad56 100644
> --- a/src/util/virresctrl.c
> +++ b/src/util/virresctrl.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct _virResctrlInfoPerType {
>      unsigned int bits;
>      unsigned int max_cache_id;
>  
> +    virBitmap *cache_ids;

I'd put an empty line after this to make it more obvious the comment
doesn't belong to @cache_ids.

>      /* In order to be self-sufficient we need size information per cache.
>       * Funnily enough, one of the outcomes of the resctrl design is that it
>       * does not account for different sizes per cache on the same level.  So

Michal



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux