On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 15:49:36 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > Write an alternative implementation of our virJSON functions, > using json-c instead of yajl. > > Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/util/virjson.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/util/virjson.c b/src/util/virjson.c > index 0edf86cd1c..8e0ba47fc9 100644 > --- a/src/util/virjson.c > +++ b/src/util/virjson.c > @@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ > #include "virenum.h" > #include "virbitmap.h" > > -#if WITH_YAJL > +#if WITH_JSON_C > +# include <json.h> > +#elif WITH_YAJL > # include <yajl/yajl_gen.h> > # include <yajl/yajl_parse.h> > > @@ -1390,7 +1392,168 @@ virJSONValueCopy(const virJSONValue *in) > } > > > -#if WITH_YAJL > +#if WITH_JSON_C > +static virJSONValue * > +virJSONValueFromJsonC(json_object *jobj) > +{ > + enum json_type type = json_object_get_type(jobj); > + virJSONValue *ret = NULL; > + > + switch (type) { > + case json_type_null: > + ret = virJSONValueNewNull(); > + break; > + case json_type_boolean: > + ret = virJSONValueNewBoolean(json_object_get_boolean(jobj)); > + break; > + case json_type_double: > + case json_type_int: { > + ret = virJSONValueNewNumber(g_strdup(json_object_get_string(jobj))); > + break; > + } > + case json_type_object: > + ret = virJSONValueNewObject(); > + { Unaddressed from previous review. Either everything inside the block or no block at all. > + json_object_object_foreach(jobj, key, val) { > + virJSONValue *cur = virJSONValueFromJsonC(val); > + > + if (virJSONValueObjectAppend(ret, key, &cur) < 0) { > + g_free(ret); > + return NULL; > + } > + } > + } > + break; > + case json_type_array: { > + size_t len; > + size_t i; > + > + ret = virJSONValueNewArray(); > + len = json_object_array_length(jobj); > + > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > + virJSONValue *cur = NULL; > + json_object *val = NULL; > + > + val = json_object_array_get_idx(jobj, i); > + > + cur = virJSONValueFromJsonC(val); > + > + virJSONValueArrayAppend(ret, &cur); > + } > + break; > + } > + case json_type_string: > + ret = virJSONValueNewString(g_strdup(json_object_get_string(jobj))); > + break; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > + > +virJSONValue * > +virJSONValueFromString(const char *jsonstring) > +{ > + json_object *jobj = NULL; > + virJSONValue *ret = NULL; > + json_tokener *tok = NULL; > + enum json_tokener_error jerr; > + int jsonflags = JSON_TOKENER_STRICT | JSON_TOKENER_VALIDATE_UTF8; > + > + VIR_DEBUG("string=%s", jsonstring); > + > + tok = json_tokener_new(); > + json_tokener_set_flags(tok, jsonflags); > + jobj = json_tokener_parse_ex(tok, jsonstring, strlen(jsonstring)); > + jerr = json_tokener_get_error(tok); > + if (jerr != json_tokener_success) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, > + "%s", json_tokener_error_desc(jerr)); > + goto cleanup; > + } > + ret = virJSONValueFromJsonC(jobj); > + > + cleanup: > + json_object_put(jobj); > + json_tokener_free(tok); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static json_object * > +virJSONValueToJsonC(virJSONValue *object) > +{ > + json_object *ret = NULL; > + size_t i; > + > + VIR_DEBUG("object=%p type=%d", object, object->type); > + > + switch (object->type) { > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_OBJECT: > + ret = json_object_new_object(); > + for (i = 0; i < object->data.object.npairs; i++) { > + json_object *child = virJSONValueToJsonC(object->data.object.pairs[i].value); > + json_object_object_add(ret, object->data.object.pairs[i].key, child); > + } > + return ret; > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_ARRAY: > + /* json_object_new_array_ext was introduced in json-c 0.16 */ > +# if JSON_C_VERSION_NUM < ((0 << 16) | (16 << 8)) > + ret = json_object_new_array(); > +# else > + ret = json_object_new_array_ext(object->data.array.nvalues); > +# endif > + for (i = 0; i < object->data.array.nvalues; i++) { > + json_object_array_add(ret, > + virJSONValueToJsonC(object->data.array.values[i])); > + } > + return ret; > + > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_STRING: > + return json_object_new_string(object->data.string); > + > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_NUMBER: { > + /* Yes. That's a random value. We only care about the string. */ Unaddressed from previous review: /* Yes. That's a random value. json-c will use the provided string representation in the JSON document it outputs. The 'json_object' tree will not be used outside of this function and thus the actual numeric value is irrelevant. */ > + return json_object_new_double_s(299792458, object->data.number); > + } > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_BOOLEAN: > + return json_object_new_boolean(object->data.boolean); > + > + case VIR_JSON_TYPE_NULL: return json_object_new_null(); Which should be available in 0.14 we require. But yes I'm aware that it'd be correct without: struct json_object *json_object_new_null(void) { return NULL; } In case you'd want to stick with 'return NULL' this will require a comment and I'll like to see it before comitting. > + default: > + return NULL; > + } > + return NULL; > +} Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>