On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:59:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/11/2010 08:44 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > > FYI, just pushed. > > > > I ran this command: > > > > cd tests && grep -l 'Copy.*Free.Sof' * |xargs perl -pi -e \ > > 's/Copyright \(C\) (.*) Free Software Foundation,/Copyright (C) $1 Red Hat,/' > > While we're at it, should our tests be GPLv3 while the rest of libvirt > is LGPLv2? One could argue that it is okay, since the tests are not > installed, but it is still something we should be sure is intentional, > and not another accident of copy-and-paste from other FSF files. It is not a showstopper if a test is GPLv3, but I think its wise to keep all the source code including tests LGPLv2+ licensed unless there's a particular exception required. This means we don't have to worry about mixed licensing when copying code between different areas of our tree. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list