libvir-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/10/2010 02:35:49 PM:
>
> Correct, IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE is not in the kernel yet. The kernel patch is
> be discussed on the kernel netdev mailing list. The most recent discussion
> is on ways to merge VDP and CDCP into what I've posted for
> IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE.
>
> I'll send out another libvirt patch once the kernel discussions are final.
>
I suppose you will provide the libvirt patch only for what seems to be
Cisco technology support. Now the slight differences in technology
that we seem to try to support here are reflected in the parameters that go into
the XML and end up in the netlink messages. Any way to consolidate that? I suppose
VM migration between different switch vendors' switch isn't going to be that
easy?
Stefan
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list