Re: [PATCH-for-9.1 02/18] hw/usb/hcd-xhci: Enumerate xhci_flags setting values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zhao,

On 6/3/24 14:27, Zhao Liu wrote:
Hi Philippe,

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Date: Tue,  5 Mar 2024 14:42:04 +0100
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH-for-9.1 02/18] hw/usb/hcd-xhci: Enumerate xhci_flags
  setting values
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0

xhci_flags are used as bits for QOM properties,
expected to be somehow stable (external interface).

Explicit their values so removing any enum doesn't
modify the other ones.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  hw/usb/hcd-xhci.h | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.h b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.h
index 98f598382a..37f0d2e43b 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.h
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-xhci.h
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@ typedef struct XHCIEPContext XHCIEPContext;
enum xhci_flags {
      XHCI_FLAG_SS_FIRST = 1,
-    XHCI_FLAG_FORCE_PCIE_ENDCAP,
-    XHCI_FLAG_ENABLE_STREAMS,
+    XHCI_FLAG_FORCE_PCIE_ENDCAP = 2,
+    XHCI_FLAG_ENABLE_STREAMS = 3,
  };


 From the commit 290fd20db6e0 ("usb xhci: change msi/msix property
type"), the enum values were modified directly.

So it seems not necessary to bind enum type with specific value,
right?

Indeed! Let's drop this patch then.

Thanks for referencing the commit,

Phil.

Thanks,
Zhao


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux