Re: [PATCH 0/3] meson: Drop userfaultfd_sysctl option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 20:53:21 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Recently introduced as part of [1].
> 
> We can skip the meson part for this one, and deal with everything
> in the spec file only.
> 
> Test pipeline: https://gitlab.com/abologna/libvirt/-/pipelines/1176890275
> 
> [1] https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/DKS4AEXZIEFLSAK7NEWZLBF6QSQL54N2/

Except for 1/3 (which I acked) I think this series is a little bit too
spec-centric. We can do a lot of things just in the spec file, but
having meson options still makes sense for people not building rpms.
Whether we use that option in our spec file or handle it differently is
another question, but I would vote against removing the meson option.

Jirka
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux