[PATCH 06/31] tests: Test the previously mishandled PCI VPD characters

[Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Modify the test data to validate '<>' and other characters.
Unfortunately the test suite doesn't have a proper end-to-end test, thus
we just add a XML->XML variant and also add data to the binary parser.

Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_42_00_0_vpd.xml | 4 ++--
 tests/virpcimock.c                               | 4 ++--
 tests/virpcivpdtest.c                            | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_42_00_0_vpd.xml b/tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_42_00_0_vpd.xml
index 8b56e4f6b4..c9a2901381 100644
--- a/tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_42_00_0_vpd.xml
+++ b/tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_42_00_0_vpd.xml
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
         <change_level>B1</change_level>
         <manufacture_id>foobar</manufacture_id>
         <part_number>MBF2H332A-AEEOT</part_number>
-        <serial_number>MT2113X00000</serial_number>
+        <serial_number>MT2113X00000&gt;&lt;</serial_number>
         <vendor_field index='0'>PCIeGen4 x8</vendor_field>
         <vendor_field index='2'>MBF2H332A-AEEOT</vendor_field>
         <vendor_field index='3'>3c53d07eec484d8aab34dabd24fe575aa</vendor_field>
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
         <asset_tag>fooasset</asset_tag>
         <vendor_field index='0'>vendorfield0</vendor_field>
         <vendor_field index='2'>vendorfield2</vendor_field>
-        <vendor_field index='A'>vendorfieldA</vendor_field>
+        <vendor_field index='A'>!@#$./&gt;&lt;</vendor_field>
         <system_field index='B'>systemfieldB</system_field>
         <system_field index='0'>systemfield0</system_field>
       </fields>
diff --git a/tests/virpcimock.c b/tests/virpcimock.c
index 13b37bb23d..2f98b0cf13 100644
--- a/tests/virpcimock.c
+++ b/tests/virpcimock.c
@@ -966,9 +966,9 @@ init_env(void)
         't', 'e', 's', 't', 'n', 'a', 'm', 'e',
         PCI_VPD_LARGE_RESOURCE_FLAG | PCI_VPD_READ_ONLY_LARGE_RESOURCE_FLAG, 0x16, 0x00,
         'P', 'N', 0x02, '4', '2',
-        'E', 'C', 0x04, '4', '2', '4', '2',
+        'E', 'C', 0x04, '4', '<', '>', '2',
         'V', 'A', 0x02, 'E', 'X',
-        'R', 'V', 0x02, 0x31, 0x00,
+        'R', 'V', 0x02, 0x1D, 0x00,
         PCI_VPD_RESOURCE_END_VAL
     };
     struct pciVPD exampleVPD = {
diff --git a/tests/virpcivpdtest.c b/tests/virpcivpdtest.c
index b4dd68b7aa..ae5772d3f5 100644
--- a/tests/virpcivpdtest.c
+++ b/tests/virpcivpdtest.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ testPCIVPDGetFieldValueFormat(const void *data G_GNUC_UNUSED)

 # define VPD_W_EXAMPLE_FIELDS \
     'V', 'Z', 0x02, '4', '2', \
-    'Y', 'A', 0x04, 'I', 'D', '4', '2', \
+    'Y', 'A', 0x04, '!', '<', '>', ':', \
     'Y', 'F', 0x02, 'E', 'X', \
     'Y', 'E', 0x00, \
     'R', 'W', 0x02, 0x00, 0x00
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ testVirPCIVPDParseFullVPD(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
     if (testVirPCIVPDValidateExampleReadOnlyFields(res))
         return -1;

-    if (STRNEQ_NULLABLE(res->rw->asset_tag, "ID42"))
+    if (STRNEQ_NULLABLE(res->rw->asset_tag, "!<>:"))
         return -1;

     if (!res->rw->vendor_specific)
-- 
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx