On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:52 AM Rob Bradford <rbradford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This has been replaced by a "pmu-mask" property that provides much more > flexibility. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <rbradford@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/about/deprecated.rst | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > index 8b136320e2..37f3414ef8 100644 > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst > @@ -361,6 +361,16 @@ Specifying the iSCSI password in plain text on the command line using the > used instead, to refer to a ``--object secret...`` instance that provides > a password via a file, or encrypted. > > +CPU device properties > +''''''''''''''''''''' > + > +``pmu-num=x`` on RISC-V CPUs (since 8.2) > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > +In order to support more flexible counter configurations this has been > +replaced by a ``pmu-mask`` property Can we give an example of how to migrate to pmu-mask? Alistair > + > + > Backwards compatibility > ----------------------- > > -- > 2.41.0 > >