On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 08:58:37PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > This results in all sockets for a service being enabled when a > single one of them is. > > The -tcp and -tls sockets are intentionally excluded, because > enabling them should require explicit action on the > administrator's part; moreover, disabling them should not result > in the local sockets being disabled too. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/locking/virtlockd-admin.socket.in | 1 + > src/locking/virtlockd.socket.in | 1 + > src/logging/virtlogd-admin.socket.in | 1 + > src/logging/virtlogd.socket.in | 1 + > src/remote/libvirtd-admin.socket.in | 2 ++ > src/remote/libvirtd-ro.socket.in | 2 ++ > src/remote/libvirtd.socket.in | 2 ++ > src/virtd-admin.socket.in | 2 ++ > src/virtd-ro.socket.in | 2 ++ > src/virtd.socket.in | 2 ++ > 10 files changed, 16 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
