On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > This annotation being missing resulted in virtlogd and virtlockd > being marked as "indirect" services, i.e. services that cannot > be started directly but have to be socket activated instead. > > While this is our preferred configuration, we shouldn't prevent > the admin to start them at boot if they want to. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/locking/virtlockd.service.in | 1 + > src/logging/virtlogd.service.in | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
