On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > On 7/5/23 8:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > > Enable by default asynchronous teardown on S390 hosts and add tests for > > asynchronous teardown autogeneration support. > > On S390 hosts, Secure Execution guests can take a long time to shutdown, > > since the memory cleanup can take a long time. Since there is no > > practical way to determine whether a S390 guest is running in Secure > > Execution mode, and since the asynchronous teardown does not impact > > normal (not Secure Execution) guests or guests without large memory > > configurations, we enable asynchronous teardown by default on S390. > > A user can select to override the default in the guest domain XML. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > As it turns out the discussion seems to be on this patch only. > Would it be acceptable to push the first four patches off the series without > the fifth patch? Yes, that's fine. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
