Hello, Am Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023, 18:49:04 CEST schrieb Andrea Bolognani: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46:40PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote: [...] > > See above - IMHO the current upstream behaviour is not perfect, and > > will hopefully change to not creating the local/ files by default > > in 4.0. > This last bit was more about Debian specifically than upstream, since > IIUC it's dh-apparmor that creates the files. But I see that you're > one of the maintainers for AppArmor in Debian, so I guess you'll be > on top of that on both fronts :) Thanks for the flowers, but I wouldn't call myself maintainer in Debian. I "only" have an eye on the Debian bugtracker for AppArmor-related bugs, but don't do packaging work there. (Same for Ubuntu, BTW.) If you want AppArmor packages maintained by me, you'll have to install openSUSE ;-) (and yes, I'm fully aware of the irony telling this to someone with a @redhat.com address ;-) > By the way, is there any plan to move from local/foo to foo.d/ for > profiles too? I imagine that the main concern would be keeping > existing configurations working, but it would be nice to have > consistency between the two, and the foo.d/ approach is generally > much more flexible... 4.0 material, perhaps? Interesting idea, I'll bring it up upstream. Regards, Christian Boltz -- My point is that we might be able to maintain a "latest and greatest" less in utilities, rather than in Base:System. Well... if "latest and greatest" applies to less in the first place.. erm... probably not. [Pascal Bleser in opensuse-packaging]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
