Re: [PATCH 3/3] qemu: Drop @unionMems argument from qemuProcessSetupPid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:41:01PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The @unionMems argument of qemuProcessSetupPid() function is not
necessary really as all callers pass 'true'. Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 31 +++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index d9269e37a1..74e85c8464 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -2550,8 +2550,7 @@ qemuProcessSetupPid(virDomainObj *vm,
                    virBitmap *cpumask,
                    unsigned long long period,
                    long long quota,
-                    virDomainThreadSchedParam *sched,
-                    bool unionMems)
+                    virDomainThreadSchedParam *sched)
{
    qemuDomainObjPrivate *priv = vm->privateData;
    virDomainNuma *numatune = vm->def->numa;
@@ -2591,21 +2590,16 @@ qemuProcessSetupPid(virDomainObj *vm,
    if (virCgroupHasController(priv->cgroup, VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPU) ||
        virCgroupHasController(priv->cgroup, VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPUSET)) {

-        if (virDomainNumatuneGetMode(numatune, -1, &mem_mode) == 0 &&
-            (mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_STRICT ||
-             mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_RESTRICTIVE)) {
-
+        if (virDomainNumatuneGetMode(numatune, -1, &mem_mode) == 0) {
            /* QEMU allocates its memory from the emulator thread. Thus it
             * needs to access union of all host nodes configured. */
-            if (unionMems &&
-                mem_mode != VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_RESTRICTIVE) {
+            if (mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_STRICT) {
                qemuDomainNumatuneMaybeFormatNodesetUnion(vm, NULL, &mem_mask);
-            } else {
-                if (virDomainNumatuneMaybeFormatNodeset(numatune,
-                                                        priv->autoNodeset,
-                                                        &mem_mask, -1) < 0)
-                    goto cleanup;
-            }
+            } else if (mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_RESTRICTIVE &&
+                       virDomainNumatuneMaybeFormatNodeset(numatune,
+                                                           priv->autoNodeset,
+                                                           &mem_mask, -1) < 0)
+                goto cleanup;

This body should also use squiggly brackets based on our coding style.
It might be cleaner to switch it around and do:

if (mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_RESTRICTIVE &&
    virDomainNumatuneMaybeFormatNodeset(numatune,
                                        priv->autoNodeset,
                                        &mem_mask, -1) < 0)
    goto cleanup;
else if (mem_mode == VIR_DOMAIN_NUMATUNE_MEM_STRICT)
    qemuDomainNumatuneMaybeFormatNodesetUnion(vm, NULL, &mem_mask);

or just do it as two different if's without the "else", mem_mode cannot
be both anyway.

With that fixed up:

Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux