On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:30:18PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> No semantic change, the now explicitly set default are all zero and
> that's what GCC sets unspecified struct members to.
> ---
> src/conf/storage_conf.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/storage_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> index 620744f..6467c73 100644
> --- a/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static virStoragePoolTypeInfo poolTypeInfo[] = {
> { .poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS,
> .poolOptions = {
> .flags = (VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_DEVICE),
> + .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS_AUTO,
> .formatFromString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemTypeFromString,
> .formatToString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemTypeToString,
> },
> @@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static virStoragePoolTypeInfo poolTypeInfo[] = {
> .poolOptions = {
> .flags = (VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_HOST |
> VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_DIR),
> - .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS_AUTO,
> + .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_NETFS_AUTO,
> .formatFromString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemNetTypeFromString,
> .formatToString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemNetTypeToString,
> },
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
ACK. Good change.
Dave
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list