On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 16:26:42 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 15:37:34 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:08:09PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 17:14:32 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > Even if fixed, it might be worth switching the .pot file anyway, but > > > > > this can't be done without us bulk updating the translations, and > > > > > bulk re-importing them, which will be challenging. We'll almost > > > > > certainly want to try this on a throw-away repo in weblate first, > > > > > not our main repo. > > > > > > > > I was able to come up with steps leading to the desired state: > > > > > > > > 0. lock weblate repository > > > > 1. update libvirt.pot from the most recent potfile job > > > > 2. push to libvirt.git > > > > 2. wait for translations update from Fedora Weblate and merge it > > > > 3. pull from libvirt.git > > > > 4. apply the first 50 patches from this seires (with required changes > > > > to make sure all translation strings are updated) > > > > 5. update all po files with the attached script > > > > 6. update libvirt.pot by running meson compile libvirt-pot > > > > 7. apply patch 51 of this series > > > > 8. push to libvirt.git > > > > 9. wait for translations update from Fedora Weblate and merge it > > > > 10. unlock weblate repository > > This looks ok, but I'm wondering if weblate will remember all > our obsolete msgids when we do step 8 ? IOW, will our po files > get the 10,000 current msgids, plus another 5,000 non-position > based msgids marked with '#~ msgid' ? No, apparently it doesn't do so. Looking at the last commit in https://gitlab.com/jirkade/libvirt/-/commits/format-strings which is an update from weblate after all the changes, there's not a single new "#~ msgid" line added. The overall statistics of the patch is 46 files changed, 28392 insertions(+), 19137 deletions(-) and it is caused by weblate (or rather msgmerge) wrapping lines as they got longer when format strings were updated using the script. So I don't thing we can just use the existing weblate component in libvirt project. > This basically looks good to me. The only minor thing I see is that > projects/libvirt/libvirt has gained some extra translations that > are not in current git master. For example in cs.po there are about > 6 fewer failing c-format checks in weblate that are still in cs.po > > That will be taken care of when you re-sync the .po files and rerun > the conversion. Right. > So I think this looks ok to go ahead with after release. Great. Thanks for checking. Do you want me to add Reviewed-by lines to all the ~100 patches with your name or something similar? Jirka
