Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] qemu: support pass-on of multiple secrets to _qemuDomainStorageSourcePrivate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 06:53:11 -0600, Or Ozeri wrote:
> This commit extends qemuDomainSecretStorageSourcePrepare
> to setup multiple qemu secrets as defined by virStorageSource->encryption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Or Ozeri <oro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> index a3b9b57cfa..ffe29dc832 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
> @@ -1482,14 +1482,19 @@ qemuDomainSecretStorageSourcePrepare(qemuDomainObjPrivate *priv,
>      }
>  
>      if (hasEnc) {
> -        srcPriv->enccount = 1;
> -        srcPriv->encinfo = g_new0(qemuDomainSecretInfo *, 1);
> -        if (!(srcPriv->encinfo[0] = qemuDomainSecretInfoSetupFromSecret(priv, aliasformat,
> -                                                                        "encryption", 0,
> -                                                                        VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_VOLUME,
> -                                                                        NULL,
> -                                                                        &src->encryption->secrets[0]->seclookupdef)))
> -            return -1;
> +        size_t nsecrets = src->encryption->nsecrets;
> +        size_t i;
> +
> +        srcPriv->enccount = nsecrets;
> +        srcPriv->encinfo = g_new0(qemuDomainSecretInfo *, nsecrets);
> +        for (i = 0; i < nsecrets; ++i) {
> +            if (!(srcPriv->encinfo[i] = qemuDomainSecretInfoSetupFromSecret(priv, aliasformat,
> +                                                                            "encryption", i,
> +                                                                            VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_VOLUME,
> +                                                                            NULL,
> +                                                                            &src->encryption->secrets[i]->seclookupdef)))
> +                return -1;
> +        }

Squash this into the previous commit. It will make more sense that way.




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux