On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 17:05:31 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:47:08AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > Similarly to the API XML we can distribute the ACL permissions for the > > > APIs so that users who are potentially interested into the data don't > > > have to scrape our web. > > > > IMHO if we want to expose this to apps, we should be including > > the info directly in the API files we already ship, rather than > > exporting something new. > > Yeah, I thought the same but didn't really fancy changing the generator > as they are partially generated by gendispatch rather than the ACL > generator as the information is in the protocol headers rather than with > the function headers. Rather than change the python generator, it would be possible to use an XSL transform to merge the ACL XML info into the main API info doc. Whether that's better or not of course depends how much you enjoy working with XSL :-) With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
