On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:49:46PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote: > On 04/07/2010 10:17 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > >On 04/06/2010 06:59 AM, Dave Allan wrote: > >>>Then again, fixing the type for your new method would imply fixing the > >>>typing of virAlloc and friends as well. > > > >Daniel's arguments are convincing; it's okay to keep the ugly cast in > >the implementation if it makes the header easier to use without having > >to embed a cast in the #define. > > Agreed. > > >>Is everybody ok with having this allocator, btw? > > > >You have my ACK, but I'm only a (small) fraction of everybody. But > >since no one is using them yet, is it worth waiting until after 0.8.0 to > >push? > > Waiting is a good idea; the patch has been hanging around my > development box for weeks, so there's no hurry. > > Dave Can I get another ack for this patch now that 0.8.0 is out? Dave -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list