On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:18:04PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
Use the helper designed to find the subelement. A slight semantic difference after this patch is that the first <zpci> element will be considered instead of the last, but only one is expected in a valid XML. Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/conf/device_conf.c | 16 ++++------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/conf/device_conf.c b/src/conf/device_conf.c index 762efe5f0b..a116e39c75 100644 --- a/src/conf/device_conf.c +++ b/src/conf/device_conf.c @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ int virPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, virPCIDeviceAddress *addr) { - xmlNodePtr cur; - xmlNodePtr zpci = NULL; + xmlNodePtr zpci;
You can initialise the variable right away here instead of ...
memset(addr, 0, sizeof(*addr)); @@ -227,18 +226,11 @@ virPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node, if (!virPCIDeviceAddressIsEmpty(addr) && !virPCIDeviceAddressIsValid(addr, true)) return -1; - cur = node->children; - while (cur) { - if (cur->type == XML_ELEMENT_NODE && - virXMLNodeNameEqual(cur, "zpci")) { - zpci = cur; - } - cur = cur->next; + if ((zpci = virXMLNodeGetSubelement(node, "zpci"))) {
... making this look like lisp ;) in first 4 patches. But I get it's a subjective preference.
+ if (virZPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(zpci, addr) < 0) + return -1; } - if (zpci && virZPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(zpci, addr) < 0) - return -1; - return 0; } -- 2.39.1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature