Re: [libvirt PATCH 7/7] ci: integration.sh: Define the SCRATCH_DIR variable for local execution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:41:10AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 04:06:03PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Running outside of GitLab will likely not have the variable set and
> hence the execution would fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> ci/integration.sh | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ci/integration.sh b/ci/integration.sh
> index 41326d6e40..ac04c46d8e 100644
> --- a/ci/integration.sh
> +++ b/ci/integration.sh
> @@ -37,6 +37,14 @@ virsh net-start default &>/dev/null || true
> # END AS ROOT
> exit
>
> +# If we're running outside of GitLab, this variable will likely not exist, so
> +# we need to define it and create the scratch directory
> +if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DIR" ]
> +then
> +    SCRATCH_DIR="/tmp/scratch"
> +    mkdir "$SCRATCH_DIR" 2>/dev/null

This could fail if someone has this directory already.  Which is a good
thing as otherwise it could override some of it.  But wouldn't it be
nicer to use mktemp -d and print the result?

Although an option, the main motivation here to remain consistent with how it
works in GitLab. Since we define SCRATCH_DIR under the 'vars' section, IIRC you
can only use a scalar value, not a command (if we can, I retract my argument)
and hence we'd have to export and define the variable under each script,
before_script, after_script sections.


I don't really understand how that affects a change from:

SCRATCH_DIR="/tmp/scratch"
mkdir "$SCRATCH_DIR"

to something like

SCRATCH_DIR=$(mktemp -d)

or possibly

SCRATCH_DIR=$(mktemp -d "/tmp/scratch.XXX")

especially when only used without the SCRATCH_DIR variable.

So, I preferred consistency here, since I wouldn't  realistically expect an
engineer to have /tmp/scratch prior to executing script given the main
motivation here is to quickly get a throwaway test machine to run the script
and THEN debug if the tests fail. So, while I agree you're right here, I don't
think it's a likely scenario.

Erik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux