Re: [PATCH V5 10/11] spec: Remove libvirt-daemon dependency from hypervisor subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/9/23 07:54, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:25:44PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
I still th8ink that dropping the dep is wrong, becasue that is
defeating the purpose of 'libvirt-daemon-$HYPERVISOR' packages
aim todo:

   "installs every possible libvirt feature for the virtualization
    driver in question"

   https://libvirt.org/kbase/rpm-deployment.html#full-features-for-one-virt-driver

If you don't want all the features, then don't install that
package, pick the minimal install instead

   https://libvirt.org/kbase/rpm-deployment.html#minimal-features-for-one-virt-driver

If you feel that the various libvirt-daemon-$hypervisor packages need
to keep providing the same exact functionality over time, then yes,
we can't drop or downgrade any of the dependencies. But, at the same
time, we're potentially breaking consumers by taking away libvirtd...

Where the functionality still exists, the packages should continue
to provide it. The case of libvirtd is a bit special, as we're in
the process of phasing out its existance. That's not the cae for
virtlockd.

Okay, the fact that we're explicitly documenting these packages as
the "every possible feature for the driver" option means that I have
no choice but to agree with you :)

Jim, can you please respin while reverting these changes that I had
suggested? Sorry :(

No problem, will send a V7. BTW, what is the list preference for suppresscc? I've been meaning to ask that after the past several versions, as I watch git send-email spam the R-B. My global .gitconfig only suppresses 'self'.

Regards,
Jim





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux