Re: [PATCH V2 1/9] spec: Move virtlockd to a new subpackage libvirt-daemon-lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:50:47AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:31:31AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  libvirt.spec.in | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Actually, adding the libvirt-daemon-lock dependency to the sanlock
> package should happen in this patch instead of in 5/9.

No we shouldn't, sanlock has no requirement for virlockd to be
present.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux