On 12/14/22 14:55, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 12/14/22 11:08, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:31:02PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
---
docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst b/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
index b5ee7fd827..bf2f4f5a6b 100644
--- a/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
+++ b/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
@@ -42,14 +42,17 @@ RPM packages
stateful drivers. This package does not contain any drivers, so further
packages need to be installed to provide the desired drivers.
- In addition to the libvirtd daemon this package also contains the virtlogd,
- virtlockd and virtproxyd daemons, plus a number of helpers, configuration
- files and other bits necessary to create and admin a virtualization host.
+ This package depends on libvirt-daemon-common, libvirt-daemon-lock,
+ libvirt-daemon-plugin-lockd, libvirt-daemon-log, and libvirt-daemon-proxy.
We probably want to point out that this package should *not* be
installed for new deployments.
Looking at the page in its entirety, I think it would make sense to
have the "Deployment choices" section first and the "RPM packages"
section after it. That is, provide the quick recipes upfront, and
leave the finer details for those who are interested in them.
Agreed, but it is unrelated to this work. Can it be a separate task?
I should have read more mail before responding :-).
Regards,
Jim
