On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:17:35PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> +%package daemon-plugin-lockd
> +Plugin for virtlockd
> +Requires: libvirt-libs = %{version}-%{release}
Maybe libvirt-daemon-lock-plugin-lockd? A bit verbose, but would help
better differenciate it from other loadable drivers.
Alternatively we could follow the example set by the storage drivers
and go with libvirt-daemon-driver-lock-lockd. Pretty ugly, and also
kind of inaccurate because, unlike the storage driver, the lock
functionality can't be loaded into the monolithic daemon and always
lives, by design, in a separate daemon.
Either way, we should take the existing libvirt-lock-sanlock package
and convert it to the new naming convention for consistency.
Both packages should depend on libvirt-daemon-lock too, instead of
just the libraries.
> +%files daemon-plugin-lockd
> +%dir %attr(0755, root, root) %{_libdir}/libvirt/lock-driver
I believe this directory belongs to either the libvirt-daemon-lock
package (more likely) or possibly the libvirt-daemon-common package.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
