Re: libvirt-guests configurability regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/07/22 18:01, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:17:00 +0100 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>> The (a) well-documented and (b) easily editable config file
>> "/etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests" is now gone.
> 
> Right, these admin-owned files are not installed anymore.
> The runtime code still uses the files, in case they are created by the admin.
> 
>> The message on commit 8eb4461645c5 says,
>>     Remove the sysconfig file and place the current desired default into
>>     the service file.
> 
> Yes, and right in the next paragraph the commit messages states the files
> are (still) recognized.
> 
> As of f8b6c7e5, libvirt-guests.sh initializes some internal defaults, then
> it loads the admin-owned sysconfig file, in case it was created.
> 
> The documentation about this specific tool (libvirt-guests(1)) states what
> values from  /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests will be recognized.
> 
> 
> While browsing various user mailing lists in the past years I often saw
> messages like "system was upgraded to new version, and as a result an
> expected file somewhere in /etc does not exist anymore. What now?".
> Apparently some folks expect files to be present before they can be edited.
> In my experience it is always possible to create the required files and
> fill them with the desired content, based on available documentation.

It's obviously possible; the question is how comfortable it is, how much
time the user now needs to spend on something that used to be much
easier / faster before.

Can you at least include the previously shipped *documented* config file
as a template in a contrib or docs directory or something?

Thanks
Laszlo




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux