On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:46 -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
<snip>
> @@ -8288,6 +8731,14 @@ static const vshCmdDef commands[] = {
> {"vcpupin", cmdVcpupin, opts_vcpupin, info_vcpupin},
> {"version", cmdVersion, NULL, info_version},
> {"vncdisplay", cmdVNCDisplay, opts_vncdisplay, info_vncdisplay},
> +
> + {"snapshot-create", cmdSnapshotCreate, opts_snapshot_create, info_snapshot_create},
> + {"snapshot-current", cmdSnapshotCurrent, opts_snapshot_current, info_snapshot_current},
> + {"snapshot-delete", cmdSnapshotDelete, opts_snapshot_delete, info_snapshot_delete},
> + {"snapshot-dumpxml", cmdSnapshotDumpXML, opts_snapshot_dumpxml, info_snapshot_dumpxml},
> + {"snapshot-list", cmdSnapshotList, opts_snapshot_list, info_snapshot_list},
> + {"revert-to-snapshot", cmdDomainRevertToSnapshot, opts_revert_to_snapshot, info_revert_to_snapshot},
> +
> {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
> };
All the new virsh commands for snapshot management follow the convention
of snapshot- prefix (like similar pool-, vol-, net- command prefixes)
except for revert-to-snapshot. From a virsh usability perspective, would
it make sense to rename this command snapshot-revert? I appreciate that
does not capture what the command does as well as revert-to-snapshot but
I think this may be a reasonable trade-off for usability and users
finding the command easily.
Thanks,
Paul
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list