Re: libvirtd: failed to connect to socket after installation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/8/22 11:12, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:07:30 -0500, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
>> Hello, made some progress and I think I see what the issue may be now...
>> and it looks like virt-install's fault.
>>
>>>> Regardless of all that, the client is trying to connect to virtqemud
>>>> but you seem to have the monolithic libvirtd daemon running. I can't
>>>> remember whether that's expected, but it's looks like a red flag to
>>>> me. I think the client might have gotten confused about whether split
>>>> daemons are in use.
>>>>
>>>> Please check out https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flibvirt.org%2Fdaemons.html&data=05%7C01%7Ccarlos.bilbao%40amd.com%7C682b310adbe74107f4fd08da91b4e994%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637982503444307132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=u78aJLvAqCey0vk%2B6drcxatNvjZkHQX2q7FplADDHiI%3D&reserved=0
>> and ensure you're
>>>> in one of the two supported deployment scenarios and not a weird mix
>>>> of the two.
>>>
>>
>> So, I started again from scratch. Deleted absolutely everything that had
>> to do with libvirt. I also had to unmask a bunch of service-related stuff
>> that were on masked state:
>>
>> for ANNOYING_SERVICE in libvirtd virtlogd.socket virtlogd.service \
>>         virtlockd.socket virtlockd.service virtlogd-admin.socket
>> virtlockd-admin.socket
>> do
>>         systemctl unmask $ANNOYING_SERVICE
>> done
>>
>> So, after doing this, building and installing the tree, reloading the
>> daemon, and starting all services and sockets again, I finally get an
>> active libvirtd daemon:
>>
>> # systemctl status libvirtd
>> ● libvirtd.service - Virtualization daemon
>>      Loaded: loaded (/usr/local/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service;
>> enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
>>      Active: active (running) since Thu 2022-09-08 15:51:39 UTC; 1min 30s
>> ago
>>        Docs: man:libvirtd(8)
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flibvirt.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ccarlos.bilbao%40amd.com%7C682b310adbe74107f4fd08da91b4e994%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637982503444307132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=f5qoDhV5n6pFQO3q7SCVt6Wr5ideZ%2BDTyDTASM%2Fcajg%3D&reserved=0
>>    Main PID: 2429457 (libvirtd)
>>       Tasks: 20 (limit: 32768)
>>      Memory: 55.6M
>>         CPU: 28ms
>>      CGroup: /system.slice/libvirtd.service
>>              ├─   2760 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq
>> --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro
>> --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/libvirt/libvirt_leaseshelper
>>              ├─   2761 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq
>> --conf-file=/var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.conf --leasefile-ro
>> --dhcp-script=/usr/lib/libvirt/libvirt_leaseshelper
>>              └─2429457 /usr/local/sbin/libvirtd --timeout 120
>>
>> Sep 08 15:51:39 host systemd[1]: Starting Virtualization daemon...
>> Sep 08 15:51:39 host systemd[1]: Started Virtualization daemon.
>> #
>>
>> Now, this is when things get interesting... The next step is testing
>> virt-install. Since I removed it, I proceed to install again:
>>
>> # sudo apt install -y virtinst
>> (...)
>> Unpacking virtinst (1:4.0.0-1) ...
>> Setting up libvirt-glib-1.0-data (4.0.0-2) ...
>> Setting up libvirt0:amd64 (8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1) ...
>> Setting up libvirt-glib-1.0-0:amd64 (4.0.0-2) ...
>> Setting up python3-libvirt (8.0.0-1build1) ...
>> Setting up libvirt-clients (8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1) ...
>> Setting up libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu (8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1) ...
>> Setting up virt-viewer (7.0-2build2) ...
>> Setting up libvirt-daemon (8.0.0-1ubuntu7.1) ...
>> Setting up virtinst (1:4.0.0-1) ...
>>
>> As you can see, virtinst also installs the libvirt daemon. I didn't think
>> this would be an issue because the libvirtd daemon running is still my
>> version. However, when I try to do virt-install I get:
>>
>> # virt-install --connect qemu:///system --name ubuntu-sev \
>> --boot loader=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.fd,loader.readonly=yes,loader.type=pflash,nvram.template=/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_VARS.fd,loader_secure=no
>> \
>> --vcpus 8 --memory 4096 --memtune hard_limit=16777216 \
>> --disk pool=default,device=disk,size=32,format=raw \
>> --controller type=scsi,model=virtio-scsi  --network
>> bridge=virbr0,model=virtio \
>> --controller type=virtio-serial --machine q35 --cpu host-passthrough \
>> --cdrom /var/lib/libvirt/images/ubuntu.iso --osinfo detect=on,require=on \
>> --launchSecurity sev,policy=0x00 --graphics none --tpm none
>> ERROR    Failed to connect socket to '/var/run/libvirt/virtqemud-sock': No
>> such file or directory
>> #
>>
>> So, back to square one. However, notice that virtqemud is one of the modular
>> daemons. So, I believe that what happens is that virt-install assumes
>> libvirt is using the new daemon mode. Is this something that can be
>> configured? I don't see that option in the man pages of virt-install.
>
> You seem to have explicitly started 'libvirtd' service. If that is the
> case the error message above is actually a bit cryptic, but in fact
> means that the 'qemu' driver was not compiled.
>
> This is because by default it's marked as optional and compiled only if
> you have all dependencies installed.
>
> You need to pass '-Ddriver_qemu=enabled' to the meson configure step to
> force-enable it. Meson will report what's missing.
>

Yep, passing -Ddriver_qemu=enabled compiled all the Qemu stuff. Then,
after starting the new libvirtd daemon, I was able to start virtqemud.socket,
which in turn fixed this error when using virt-install.

Thanks,
Carlos





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux