Re: [PATCH 2/2] qemu: Remove host-passthrough validation check for host-phys-bits=on

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 11:18 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 8/17/22 08:47, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > On 8/17/22 02:19, Lin Ma wrote:
> > > Besides the -cpu host, The host-phys-bits=on applies to custom or
> > > max
> > > cpu model, So the host-passthrough validation check is
> > > unnecessary for
> > > maxphysaddr with mode='passthrough'.
> > 
> > I wonder why Dario added the check? He even added a test for it: 
> > cpu-phys-bits-passthrough2 in qemuxml2argvtest. He is off now, so
> > we'll have to 
> > await his return for an answer.
> 
> BTW, I'm not doubting your analysis. In fact, I tested with one of
> the known CPU 
> models (-cpu Cascadelake-Server,...,host-phys-bits=on) and it worked
> fine with a 
> 7TB VM. I'd still like to know why Dario added the check. Perhaps he
> encountered 
> some problematic corner cases.
>
Not really, no. IIRC, QEMU was behaving differently than how it work
this days, when I wrote this, but even back then host-phys-bits=on was
fine with -cpu != host.

The check is there just because I thought that, if you're using a
specific CPU model, and not host-passthrough, that's probably because
you don't want the host details to "leak" into the VM (for migration or
whatever). Hence, you shouldn't use phys-bits passthrough either.

Like, you need the CPU to be CascadeLake-Server for migration purposes,
your host has 52 bits and you know you need a large VM so instead of
wasting time doing the math, you just go for passthrough (for the phys
bits, of course). Then you migrate on an host with 46 bits, which would
also have been fine for the size VM, but now, since you've basically
used 52, it's a problem.

But maybe this is not something that should be solved at this level, as
it's probably the job of `virsh cpu-baseline`? Does that includes and
takes into account this aspect (phys-bits) already?

So, yeah, if that check was too much policying, I think it's fine to
get rid of it. Nothing should explode :-)

Thanks and Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux