On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:30:52PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:22:16 +0000, Liu Yiding wrote: > > Add A64FX as a supported cpu model. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yiding <liuyd.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > src/cpu_map/arm_A64FX.xml | 6 ++++++ > > src/cpu_map/arm_vendors.xml | 1 + > > src/cpu_map/index.xml | 3 +++ > > src/cpu_map/meson.build | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 src/cpu_map/arm_A64FX.xml > > CPU detection for ARM is a bit awkward and not very useful in practice. > It will (in some cases) report the host CPU in host capabilities, but > that's it. The CPU from host capabilities cannot really be used in > general for specifying a guest CPU in domain XML and it would not even > make a lot of sense as I believe the only really supported CPU for KVM > is "host" (mode="host-passthrough" in domain XML). This still lets it be used for a guest with TCG, which has no requirement to use 'host'. > I'm not saying the patch is wrong, I'm just trying to make sure you > don't expect something more from implementing this patch. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
