On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 17:35 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 06:22:12PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > > The output of "virsh capabilities" was not conformant to the > > capability.rng schema. Add the missing element to the schema. > > The RNG files are applied against every XML file under tests/, > so if we have an unnoticed gap in an RNG file, that is in turn > a sign that we have insufficient XML files for in tests/ This is the output of "virsh capabilities", not some input file. I don't see a good way to test this (or mock for it) short of full integration tests. > > > > Fixes: c647bf29afb9890c792172ecf7db2c9c27babbb6 > > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > src/conf/schemas/cputypes.rng | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > diff --git a/src/conf/schemas/cputypes.rng > > b/src/conf/schemas/cputypes.rng > > index 4ae386c3c0..d02f2f88cf 100644 > > --- a/src/conf/schemas/cputypes.rng > > +++ b/src/conf/schemas/cputypes.rng > > @@ -387,6 +387,9 @@ > > <optional> > > <ref name="cpuTopology"/> > > </optional> > > + <optional> > > + <ref name="cpuMaxPhysAddr"/> > > + </optional> > > <zeroOrMore> > > <element name="feature"> > > <attribute name="name"> > > So this change is fine, but we also ought to have an XML file to > illustrate the usage Is this a "reviewed-by"? Thanks, Tim > > With regards, > Daniel
