On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 15:11:08 +0200, Kristina Hanicova wrote:
> Switch is used for just one case, so I replaced it with a simple
> if condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kristina Hanicova <khanicov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index b903dac1cb..f51476c968 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -2904,8 +2904,7 @@ void virDomainChrDefFree(virDomainChrDef *def)
> if (!def)
> return;
>
> - switch (def->deviceType) {
Alternatively a more future proof (but more verbose) approach which we
are doing in many places is to use the proper type (either by fixing the
struct to use proper type, or typecasting) in the switch expression and
then simply enumerate all values.
That way any further addition doesn't have to un-do this patch.
> - case VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_DEVICE_TYPE_CHANNEL:
> + if (def->deviceType == VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_DEVICE_TYPE_CHANNEL) {
> switch (def->targetType) {
> case VIR_DOMAIN_CHR_CHANNEL_TARGET_TYPE_GUESTFWD:
> g_free(def->target.addr);
> @@ -2916,10 +2915,6 @@ void virDomainChrDefFree(virDomainChrDef *def)
> g_free(def->target.name);
> break;
> }
> - break;
> -
> - default:
> - break;
> }
>
> virObjectUnref(def->source);
> --
> 2.35.3
>
