On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 06:09:39PM +0200, Tim Wiederhake wrote: > Create a function to query the hypervisor for its list of known CPU model > names. This is different from virConnectGetCPUModelNames, as this new > function will determine the list of CPU models (and alias names) at > runtime. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h | 6 ++++ > src/driver-hypervisor.h | 8 +++++ > src/libvirt-host.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/libvirt_public.syms | 1 + > 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h > index 3112f2b676..5aaa001adb 100644 > --- a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h > +++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h > @@ -962,6 +962,12 @@ int virConnectGetCPUModelNames(virConnectPtr conn, > char ***models, > unsigned int flags); > > +int virConnectGetHypervisorCPUModelNames(virConnectPtr conn, > + const char *arch, > + char ***names, > + char ***aliases, > + unsigned int flags); We have a notion of deprecation for CPU models. I wonder if we should include or omit deprecated CPU models by default, possibly determined based on a flag ? With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
