On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 16:43:30 +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote: > On 6/3/22 09:36, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 22:49:15 +0000, Yang, Lin A wrote: > >> On 6/2/22, 11:28 AM, "Yang, Lin A" <lin.a.yang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 6/1/22, 11:37 PM, "Michal Prívozník" <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > Exactly. This is what I was also suggesting, to just not bother with 6.2 > at all and aim at 7.0. But it looks like Yang is aiming on supporting > 6.2 too. This is going to create complicated implementation for a little > benefit IMO. But I'm not the one writing patches :-) One thing to also consider is that we'll be the ones stuck with maintaining them once they are upstream. So I strongly suggest that only the new approach is implemented unless there are good reasons do support 6.2 too which should be properly justified or with a commitment to more upstream contributions to offset it.
