Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 09:27:08AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 19/05/2022 09.08, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> > On 19/05/2022 08.39, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> > > On 18/05/2022 17.08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > > > Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The "-display sdl" option still uses a hand-crafted parser for its
>> > > > > parameters since we didn't want to drag an interface we considered
>> > > > > somewhat flawed into the QAPI schema. Since the flaws are gone now,
>> > > > > it's time to QAPIfy.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This introduces the new "DisplaySDL" QAPI struct that is used to hold
>> > > > > the parameters that are unique to the SDL display. The only specific
>> > > > > parameter is currently "grab-mod" that is used to specify the required
>> > > > > modifier keys to escape from the mouse grabbing mode.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > qapi/ui.json | 27 +++++++++++++++-
>> > > > > include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 --
>> > > > > softmmu/globals.c | 2 --
>> > > > > softmmu/vl.c | 70 +----------------------------------------
>> > > > > ui/sdl2.c | 10 ++++++
>> > > > > 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json
>> > > > > index 11a827d10f..a244e26e0f 100644
>> > > > > --- a/qapi/ui.json
>> > > > > +++ b/qapi/ui.json
>> > > > > @@ -1295,6 +1295,30 @@
>> > > > > '*swap-opt-cmd': 'bool'
>> > > > > } }
>> > > > > +##
>> > > > > +# @GrabMod:
>> > > > > +#
>> > > > > +# Set of modifier keys that need to be hold for shortcut key actions.
>> > > > > +#
>> > > > > +# Since: 7.1
>> > > > > +##
>> > > > > +{ 'enum' : 'GrabMod',
>> > > > > + 'data' : [ 'lctrl-lalt', 'lshift-lctrl-lalt', 'rctrl' ] }
>> > > >
>> > > > This is fine now. If we ever generalize to "arbitrary set of modifier
>> > > > keys", it'll become somewhat awkward. No objection from me.
>>
>> Oh well, I just noticed that we already have a GrabToggleKeys enum in
>> qapi/common.json ... I wonder whether I should try to use that instead? It
>> seems to be used in a slightly different context, though, if I get that
>> right ...?
>
> It also doesn't distinguish left & right control/alt/shift keys
> for some reason. So you would end up having to add more enum
> entries for SDL, none of which overlap with existing enum entries.
> Rather a pity, as the consistency would have been nice
Speaking of consistency: stick to the key names we use in QKeyCode?
Sadly, they contain '_'.
