On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 14:07:10 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 13:32:38 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 13:30:57 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: [....] > > > I guess the migration would just hang waiting for an event that never > > > comes. But I guess it should be fairly easy to check whether events are > > > enabled before starting a migration and report an error instead of > > > hanging. > > > > Leaving the VM in a hanging migration would be bad, but if we can just > > refuse it I'd be okay with that. > > Actually, doing so would not make any sense. We could just as easy > enable the capability on reconnect if it's not enabled. Which is the > alternative solution I described above in the Notes section :-) I think I'm also starting to lean towards the fact that "This can't happen" and simply ignore it ;) ... I'm not sure if I: Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> It somewhere else in this thread.
