On 5/6/22 10:31, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 10:29:32AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote: >> On 5/6/22 10:03, Andrea Bolognani wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> ci/containers/ubuntu-2204.Dockerfile | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> ci/gitlab.yml | 16 +++++ >>> ci/manifest.yml | 2 + >>> 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 ci/containers/ubuntu-2204.Dockerfile >> >> >>> >>> @@ -592,6 +599,15 @@ x86_64-ubuntu-2004-clang: >>> UBSAN_OPTIONS: print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1 >>> >>> >>> +x86_64-ubuntu-2204: >>> + extends: .native_build_job >>> + needs: >>> + - x86_64-ubuntu-2204-container >>> + allow_failure: false >>> + variables: >>> + NAME: ubuntu-2204 >>> + >>> + >>> >>> # Cross build jobs >>> >>> diff --git a/ci/manifest.yml b/ci/manifest.yml >>> index e221cd54f3..9a643be5b8 100644 >>> --- a/ci/manifest.yml >>> +++ b/ci/manifest.yml >>> @@ -223,3 +223,5 @@ targets: >>> CC: clang >>> MESON_ARGS: -Db_lundef=false -Db_sanitize=address,undefined >>> UBSAN_OPTIONS: print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1 >>> + >>> + ubuntu-2204: x86_64 >> >> Any reason we don't want to run ASAN on new Ubuntu? Or we do that only >> for clang? > > We only need ASAN running on one job and which one is pretty much > arbitrary unless someone can point to clear benefits for one over > the other wrt ASAN results. Ah, good point. Let me ack the series then. Michal
