On 4/29/22 12:08 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > On 4/28/22 2:55 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:13:22PM +0200, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>> where it can be reused by other helpers. >>> No changes other than the move. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> po/POTFILES.in | 1 + >>> src/util/iohelper.c | 178 +---------------------------------- >>> src/util/meson.build | 2 + >>> src/util/runio.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> src/util/runio.h | 23 +++++ >>> 5 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 src/util/runio.c >>> create mode 100644 src/util/runio.h >> >> >> >>> +off_t runIO(const char *path, int fd, int oflags); >> >> I think we could just put it in virfile.{ch} and call it >> virFileCopyData > > hmmm... it is not quite as generic as the name would imply though. > > The API centers around a transfer between a disk (the focus of the API), and something else (pipe, socket). > > What about VirFileDiskCopy? > Btw what about #define VIR_FROM_THIS ? In virtfile.c it is #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE while in iohelper it is #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_STORAGE I guess this is error-reporting related, should we lose the #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_STORAGE with the move to virfile.c ? Thanks, Claudio