libvir-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/29/2010 11:35:31 AM:
>
> I've just run the code through clang, and it spotted a few new problems.
> Here's one:
>
> >From 4c848787c8268e37db9a1d0754b8fcd8e5774f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <meyering@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:34:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] nwfilter_conf.c: don't test an uninitialized local variable
>
> * src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c (virNWIPAddressFormat): Do not use "i"
> uninitialized.
> ---
> src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c b/src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c
> index e82aae6..f673e69 100644
> --- a/src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/nwfilter_conf.c
> @@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@ virNWIPAddressFormat(virBufferPtr buf,
> nwIPAddressPtr ipaddr)
> ipaddr->addr.ipv4Addr[2],
> ipaddr->addr.ipv4Addr[3]);
> } else {
> - int i;
> + unsigned int i = 0;
> int dcshown = 0, in_dc = 0;
> unsigned short n;
> while (i < 8) {
> --
> 1.7.0.3.448.g82eeb
Thanks so much for looking at this. I do have a patch following Daniel V.'s suggestion to get rid of the home-cooked IPv6 parser/print function and it will do away with that code section.
Regards,
Stefan
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list