On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:01:54PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: > Regardless of the platform being mostly advertising, trolling > and promoting stupidity [0][1], > > [0] https://news.mit.edu/2018/study-twitter-false-news-travels-faster-true-stories-0308 > [1] https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/twitter-blue-fragments-folder/nft While I don't necessarily disagree with your assessment of Twitter as a platform... > the link points to the 'libvirt' > hashtag which never gained traction or contained useful information. ... I'd prefer sticking with just the more objectively measurable rationale :) > <h3>Community</h3> > <ul> > - <li><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/libvirt";>twitter</a></li> > <li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/libvirt";>stackoverflow</a></li> > <li><a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/libvirt";>serverfault</a></li> Honestly I think that *all of these* should go. Twitter is the one where the number of useful posts is just so low that it's not worth bothering, but in general having these links in the website's footer might give people the expectation that libvirt developers are actively participating in those communities and offering support through them, which AFAIK is simply not the case. A link to https://planet.virt-tools.org/ might fit into this section, but that's about it in my opinion. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
