On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:48:54PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:22:16PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote: > > ... > > > > +x86_64-centos-stream-9: > > > > + extends: .native_build_job > > > > + needs: > > > > + - x86_64-centos-stream-9-container > > > > + allow_failure: false > > > > + variables: > > > > + NAME: centos-stream-9 > > > > > > Bearing in mind that c9s is an unreleased distro, we might > > > find ourselves needing allow_failure: true - hopefully not, > > > but lets keep an eye on how reliable this is once merged. > > > > What do you mean by unreleased? > > CentOS 9 stream is a rolling release distro. > > Stuff in c9s has had automated QA done, but it is by no means as > reliable as the RHEL-9.0 GA release should eventually be, as its > just a snapshot in time of unreleased distro content. > > I know openstack upstream CI integration has been hit by regressions > appearing in c9s. One example was hotplug completely breaking recently > due to the QEMU -device JSON bug. Of course this very CI for libvirt > would identify that particular bug, but we're vulnerable to bugs in > the rest of the distro still while its under development. I see what you mean now. I hope it'll behave more like regular Fedoras and not like Rawhide. I'll push the first 2 patches then. Thanks, Erik
