Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Re: Supporting hypervisor specific APIs in libvirt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2010 10:26 AM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
On 24/03/10 21:40, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If so, what C clients you expected beyond libvirt?

Users want a C API. I don't agree that libvirt is the only C interface consumer out there.

(I've seen this written too many times ...)
How do you know that ? did you do a poll or something where *actual* users vote/tell ?

From my point of view, i wouldn't want to write a high level management toolstack in C, specially since the API is well defined JSON which is easily available in all high level language out there.


Strongly agreed. Even the managementy bits of qemu (anything around QObject) are suffering from the lowleveledness of C.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]