Re: [PATCH] Fix missing-field-initializers error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2022/1/13 1:31, Daniel P. Berrangé 写道:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:37:45AM +0800, Hyman wrote:


在 2022/1/13 0:22, Daniel P. Berrangé 写道:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:11:47AM +0800, huangy81@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

When compile libvirt via ninja tool with default configuration,
it report the error message as the following:
"missing initializer for field 'path' of 'virTPMBinaryInfo'".
So initialize the 'path' field in 'virTPMBinaryInfo' with 'NULL'.

I'm wondering why this isn't reported by our automated CI.

What OS distro / GCC / CLang version are you seeing this with ?
The following is my work env:

OS distro: CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)

CentOS 7 is no longer a supported build platform for libvirt
(nor QEMU either)

GCC version: gcc (GCC) 7.5.0

That GCC is used in Ubuntu 18.04 and isn't issuing warnings
about this.

Finally  -Wmissing-field-initializers is explicitly documented
as *not* issuing a warning for named fields

[quote "info gcc"]
'-Wmissing-field-initializers'
      Warn if a structure's initializer has some fields missing.  For
      example, the following code causes such a warning, because 'x.h' is
      implicitly zero:

           struct s { int f, g, h; };
           struct s x = { 3, 4 };

      This option does not warn about designated initializers, so the
      following modification does not trigger a warning:

           struct s { int f, g, h; };
           struct s x = { .f = 3, .g = 4 };
[/quote]

Given CentOS 7 is no longer a supported platform, we
can see GCC 7.5.0 works on other platforms, and the
-Wmissing-field-initializers warning isn';t supposed
to complain about this scenario, I don't want to take
this patch.
Ok, sounds reasonable.

I'd also strongly encourage you to upgrade to a newer
development platform, given CentOS 7 is explicitly
not something the libvirt project wants to target
anymore.

Ok, i get it and thanks for the eetailed explanation :)

Regards,
Daniel





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux