On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:41:25PM +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
+ ("/docs/glib-adoption.rst", "preferrable"),
This is an actual typo, isn't it?
+ ("/docs/js/main.js", "whats"),
+ ("/src/libxl/libxl_logger.c", "purposedly"),
+ ("/src/qemu/qemu_process.c", "wee"),
+ ("/tests/storagepoolxml2xml", "cant"),
These are a few cases where I feel that rewording the existing
comment or piece of code, even if it wouldn't strictly speaking count
as fixing a typo, would still be preferable to having to list it as
an exception.
+ ("/src/util/virnetdevmacvlan.c", "calld"),
Same for this one, but I appreciate that others might consider
renaming the variable as unnecessary churn and not worth the effort.
+ ("/src/security/apparmor/libvirt-lxc", "devic"),
Looking at the context where this appears:
deny /sys/d[^e]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/de[^v]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/dev[^i]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devi[^c]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devic[^e]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/device[^s]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/[^v]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/v[^i]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/vi[^r]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/vir[^t]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virt[^u]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtu[^a]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtua[^l]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtual/[^n]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtual/n[^e]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtual/ne[^t]*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtual/net?*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices/virtual?*{,/**} wklx,
deny /sys/devices?*{,/**} wklx,
I mean, I don't speak AppArmor but this can't be right, can it? :D
