On a Friday in 2022, Ani Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Ján Tomko wrote:On a Friday in 2022, Ani Sinha wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Michal Prívozník wrote: > > I don't think so. Just like we've discussed under one patch of yours, a > > function should either report error in all cases or none. And in case of > > virProcessGetSchedInfo() the linux version does report error > > I see your point but there is also a bug in that function - not all error > paths report errors. For example, !proc and !lines cases. We need to fix > that. > I don't see a !proc error path in virProcessGetSchedInfo.if (tid) proc = g_strdup_printf("/proc/%d/task/%d/sched", (int) pid, (int) tid); else proc = g_strdup_printf("/proc/%d/sched", (int) pid); if (!proc) return -1; <=== not reported
Oh, I did not realize that I had Michal's patch that removes it applied locally: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2022-January/msg00270.html Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature