On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:15:35AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/22/2010 08:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:25:31AM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote: > >> --- > >> bootstrap.conf | 1 + > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf > >> index 157092f..fb862ad 100644 > >> --- a/bootstrap.conf > >> +++ b/bootstrap.conf > >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ strsep > >> sys_stat > >> time_r > >> useless-if-before-free > >> +usleep > >> vasprintf > >> verify > >> vc-list-files > >> -- > > > > ACK > > POSIX 2008 delisted usleep as an obsolete interface; it has some > usability issues when compared to nanosleep. While gnulib at least > fixes the worst of the portability problems (namely, the fact that > usleep is not required to sleep longer than 1 second, even though it can > sleep over 4000 seconds on glibc), I'm wondering if we should instead be > converting all existing uses of usleep to a more modern interface. Sure, we use nansleep in the QEMU driver already too Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list