On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:15:49AM -0500, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:58:29AM -0500, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Dan, should I consider your criticism of the approach an explicit > > NACK? If not, I will pick up Pavel's ACK and push this. > > > > I think the latter is the right thing to do, on the basis that it > > will leave us in a place that's strictly better than the status quo > > and that - to the best of my knowledge - no alternative that doesn't > > itself suffer from known drawbacks has been proposed. > > Since no actual NACK has been raised over the past three months, nor > has an alternative implementation materialized, I went ahead and > pushed the change. This broke FreeBSD CI https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/pipelines/400924210/failures Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|